翻訳と辞書 ・ Lelkom ・ Lelkowo ・ Lella Cuberli ・ Lella Lombardi ・ Lella Ricci ・ Lella Secor Florence ・ Lella Vignelli ・ Lellapere ・ Lellapere-Nurme ・ Lelle ・ Lelle (disambiguation) ・ Leland Tollett ・ Leland Tower ・ Leland Township, Michigan ・ Leland Trail ・ Leland v. Oregon ・ Leland W. Carr ・ Leland Wilkinson ・ Leland Wright ・ Leland Yee ・ Leland, Illinois ・ Leland, Iowa ・ Leland, Michigan ・ Leland, Mississippi ・ Leland, North Carolina ・ Leland, Norway ・ Leland, Oregon ・ Leland, Utah ・ Leland, Wisconsin ・ Lelang Commandery
|
|
Leland v. Oregon : ウィキペディア英語版 | Leland v. Oregon
''Leland v. Oregon'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of placing the burden of persuasion on the defendant when they argue an insanity defense in a criminal trial.〔Bonnie, R.J. et al. ''Criminal Law, Second Edition.'' Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2004, p. 541〕 The defendant was convicted of killing a fifteen-year-old girl in Multnomah County. After being arrested for auto theft, the defendant asked for a homicide officer, verbally confessed to the murder, took the police to the scene of the crime, and signed a written confession. After being indicted, he then spoke to a lawyer for the first time. At trial, a jury convicted him and recommended the death penalty. Oregon law required the defendant required proof of insanity beyond a reasonable doubt. The case claimed that the "statute in effect requires a defendant pleading insanity to establish his innocence by disproving beyond a reasonable doubt elements of the crime necessary to a verdict of guilty, and that the statute is therefore violative of that due process of law secured by the Fourteenth Amendment." == References ==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Leland v. Oregon」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|